Traffic or inquiries have declined
Identify which pages and query groups changed, when the decline began, and which explanations are supported by the available data.
Understand what limits your organic search performance before investing in more content or another round of fixes. VortAxis reviews your website, validates the important findings, and delivers a prioritized plan your team can use.
A website SEO audit is useful when the next investment is unclear. We connect technical findings, search performance, and page relevance to the decision you need to make.
Identify which pages and query groups changed, when the decline began, and which explanations are supported by the available data.
Find barriers in discovery, targeting, structure, or content. Establish whether important pages answer the searches your buyers actually make.
Review your website before a new engagement, a redesign, or a change of strategy. Give your internal team a clearer basis for prioritizing work.
A comprehensive review can cover the areas below. We confirm depth, page coverage, markets, and data requirements before starting; a focused audit may cover only selected areas.
Assess whether the right pages can be discovered, rendered, and indexed.
Typical output: Validated technical findings, affected examples, and recommended fixes.
Understand how your architecture supports important pages.
Typical output: Architecture recommendations and internal linking priorities.
Check whether important pages match the searches they target.
Typical output: Page-level recommendations tied to specific search intents.
Separate useful content opportunities from unnecessary publishing.
Typical output: A content action inventory with reasons for each recommendation.
Put off-site signals and competitive gaps in context.
Typical output: A contextual backlink review and relevant competitor observations.
Check whether your data supports the questions being asked.
Typical output: A performance baseline, measurement limitations, and next steps.
Tools support the investigation. Crawl warnings and third-party metrics are inputs. We validate important findings against actual pages, business relevance, and available first-party data.
The audit should make implementation easier. We agree the format around the people who will use the findings, from business stakeholders to developers and content teams.
A concise explanation of the main constraints, why they matter, and the decisions needed from your team.
Documented issues with affected URLs or templates, examples, likely implications, and relevant supporting evidence.
An editable list of recommended tasks with relative priority, dependencies, and suggested implementation ownership.
Specific guidance for the agreed pages or content groups. Clear next actions rather than a generic checklist.
A recommended sequence that separates immediate constraints from improvements requiring development, content, or further research.
A review of the report and recommendations, with time for questions and clarification of the next steps.
The proposal specifies deliverable formats, included review time, and any follow-up validation. Audit delivery does not automatically include implementing every recommendation.
The highest warning count does not necessarily indicate the highest business priority. We consider the issue, its reach, the evidence, and the resources needed to resolve it.
| Criterion | Question we ask | How it shapes the plan |
|---|---|---|
| Business relevance | Does this affect pages or journeys connected to your offer? | Give priority to issues affecting important commercial destinations. |
| Evidence & reach | Is the issue confirmed, and how many relevant pages are affected? | Distinguish validated template-wide problems from isolated warnings. |
| Dependencies | Does another task depend on this being resolved first? | Address access and indexing constraints before expanding affected content. |
| Implementation effort | What resources, approvals, and risks does the fix involve? | Organize practical workstreams and flag tasks requiring specialist input. |
Example: if an important service page has an unintended noindex directive, resolving that constraint may come before rewriting its metadata. We check the actual situation before recommending either change.
For websites needing an assessment across technical health, structure, targeting, content, and performance. Useful before a substantial change in SEO investment.
Best for: understanding the main constraints across the website.
For a specific question: indexing problems, a traffic decline, content overlap, or an underperforming group of commercial pages.
Best for: a known bottleneck that needs a deeper investigation.
Agree the website, goals, markets, page groups, competitors, and questions the audit should answer.
Review available search data, crawl results, pages, templates, and supporting material. Validate important observations.
Document findings, distinguish facts from hypotheses, and organize recommendations by relevance and dependencies.
Walk through the report, clarify responsibilities, and agree any separately scoped implementation or follow-up work.
We can review publicly accessible pages without analytics access. However, traffic diagnosis and conversion conclusions will be limited; the report will explain those limits.
Assess feature, integration, use-case, and comparison pages alongside public documentation and app boundaries. Check whether search coverage reflects real product capabilities.
Review commercial services, industry expertise, case studies, and supporting content. Identify gaps in targeting and the explanations buyers need to assess fit.
Review specialist offers, lead-generation paths, and the relationship between informational traffic and relevant inquiries. Account for longer decision cycles.
VortAxis is built around Ivan Kirsanov’s SEO experience since 2012, with recent work focused primarily on SaaS and IT. The review is tailored to the agreed business context.
SEO audits are quoted individually. The fee depends on the website’s size and complexity, page coverage, markets, competitors, available data, and required depth.
We confirm the deliverables, schedule, review session, and fee before starting. Larger or multilingual websites may require a different scope from a focused SaaS marketing site.
Your team can implement the recommendations using the agreed deliverables. We can also discuss separately scoped assistance with technical coordination, content updates, or ongoing SEO.
Follow-up verification is included only when specified in the proposal. A review does not require you to purchase a monthly retainer.
An SEO audit evaluates the factors affecting a website’s organic search performance. It identifies validated problems and opportunities, explains their relevance, and organizes recommended next steps for the agreed scope.
A comprehensive audit can cover technical health, indexing, site structure, internal links, on-page targeting, content, backlink context, and measurement. Your proposal specifies coverage, depth, deliverables, and exclusions.
No. Automated tools help collect observations, but we review important findings in context. Recommendations should explain the affected pages, evidence, relevance, and practical next action.
The fee is quoted after scoping. Website complexity, page coverage, markets, competitors, data requirements, and the depth of investigation affect the work. We agree the price before starting.
The schedule is confirmed after the scope is defined and the required access is available. A focused investigation and a comprehensive review of a large website require different timelines.
These accounts provide useful first-party evidence when performance analysis is included. Public-page reviews are possible without them, but conclusions about traffic and conversions will be more limited.
The audit delivers findings and recommendations. Implementation is included only when explicitly agreed. We can discuss separate support or provide tasks for your developers, writers, and marketing team.
Yes. A focused investigation can assess affected pages and queries, timing, changes, and technical or content factors. We distinguish evidence from hypotheses rather than assuming every decline has the same cause.
Yes. We can tailor the scope to SaaS page types or assess the website impact of current SEO activity. If the main question concerns the strategy itself, we may recommend a strategy review alongside or instead of a technical audit.
No. An audit identifies and prioritizes work. Outcomes depend on implementation, competition, your offer, and search engine systems. We explain the reasoning and limits behind each major recommendation.
Share your website and the question you need answered. We’ll discuss the right audit scope, the data required, and the deliverables your team can use.
The initial conversation helps define fit and scope. Detailed analysis and recommendations are part of the paid audit.